creaothceann said:
Heck, Phase Connect sells coffee, in addition to being a vtuber company.
Correction. Phase Connect is a coffee company. They just so happen to have vtubers as a side job
Posted under Bugs & Features
creaothceann said:
Heck, Phase Connect sells coffee, in addition to being a vtuber company.
Correction. Phase Connect is a coffee company. They just so happen to have vtubers as a side job
Do you tell every artist this when they put alternate versions on Patreon/Fanbox too? :ExuCurse:
It's only three tags that are somewhat controversial, that's it, and they make up less than 2% of the site's total posts. There's loads of other content to enjoy. Unless you're into that kind, then, there's that. It's not even paywalled anymore because you can't pay for it. Raffle up or contribute. :BlobKnife:
Changli said:
Do you tell every artist this when they put alternate versions on Patreon/Fanbox too? :ExuCurse:
It's only three tags that are somewhat controversial, that's it, and they make up less than 2% of the site's total posts. There's loads of other content to enjoy. Unless you're into that kind, then, there's that. It's not even paywalled anymore because you can't pay for it. Raffle up or contribute. :BlobKnife:
It's only two tags. The third tag, assuming you mean what I think you do, is already covered by the other two, so blocking that one as well would be redundant.
Changli said:
Do you tell every artist this when they put alternate versions on Patreon/Fanbox too? :ExuCurse:
It's only three tags that are somewhat controversial, that's it, and they make up less than 2% of the site's total posts. There's loads of other content to enjoy. Unless you're into that kind, then, there's that. It's not even paywalled anymore because you can't pay for it. Raffle up or contribute. :BlobKnife:
Yea I don't buy it if you know we're to see it for free pirate all the way.😀
blindVigil said:
It's only two tags. The third tag, assuming you mean what I think you do, is already covered by the other two, so blocking that one as well would be redundant.
It's still three tags because that's also a censored tag. I don't care what the technicalities, redundancies, semantics or otherwise are. If it's three tags, it's three tags.
Changli said:
It's still three tags because that's also a censored tag. I don't care what the technicalities, redundancies, semantics or otherwise are. If it's three tags, it's three tags.
No, it's not. There are two censored tags. The third tag is not censored. If someone fails to add one of the other two tags to a post with that third tag, a member level user would be able to see that post. It's not a technicality, that tag is not censored.
blindVigil said:
No, it's not. There are two censored tags. The third tag is not censored. If someone fails to add one of the other two tags to a post with that third tag, a member level user would be able to see that post. It's not a technicality, that tag is not censored.
Is forum #4987 outdated then? 'cause it lists it as a censored tag.
blindVigil said:
No, it's not. There are two censored tags. The third tag is not censored. If someone fails to add one of the other two tags to a post with that third tag, a member level user would be able to see that post. It's not a technicality, that tag is not censored.
Changli is correct. The tag is censored independently of loli and shota. Try viewing these posts while logged out.
post #2255580
post #2358718
post #2361872
Blank_User said:
Changli is correct. The tag is censored independently of loli and shota. Try viewing these posts while logged out.
post #2255580
post #2358718
post #2361872
I was going to say Help:censored tags should be updated to mention that, then, but looking at the history, evazion is the reason it doesn't, so I assume there was a good reason for it.
I don't really see why those shouldn't also be tagged loli, though. If the argument is that they aren't really being sexualized, then I don't think they should be tagged toddlercon since we wouldn't tag a child loli if she wasn't the one being sexualized.
blindVigil said:
I don't really see why those shouldn't also be tagged loli, though. If the argument is that they aren't really being sexualized, then I don't think they should be tagged toddlercon since we wouldn't tag a child loli if she wasn't the one being sexualized.
They definitely should be tagged loli. I added the tags. There were also 4 deleted posts with neither loli nor shota. Two of them (post #3076232 and post #3076234) show a woman giving birth in the middle of having sex. Those shouldn't be tagged with either imo; you can't tell what the baby's sex is because you can only see the head. But I think toddlercon still fits even though the baby isn't technically involved in the sex act itself.
Even without those posts, considering toddlercon content is even more problematic than regular loli/shota, I don't think it would be beneficial to remove its censored tag status even with the redundancy. Having an extra layer of protection doesn't hurt.
Changli said:
Do you tell every artist this when they put alternate versions on Patreon/Fanbox too? :ExuCurse:
It's only three tags that are somewhat controversial, that's it, and they make up less than 2% of the site's total posts. There's loads of other content to enjoy. Unless you're into that kind, then, there's that. It's not even paywalled anymore because you can't pay for it. Raffle up or contribute. :BlobKnife:
Have you considered that some users are more interested into unlocking the usage of multiple tags rather than seeing some stuff that shouldn't be available in the website in the first place?
Roflidopi said:
Have you considered that some users are more interested into unlocking the usage of multiple tags rather than seeing some stuff that shouldn't be available in the website in the first place?
Have you considered that the person you quoted was responding to someone complaining about paywalled content?
If you're just here to virtue signal, you're more than welcome to leave.
Yes because I see it almost every time I get a notification about a post in this thread. Thankfully, that post was made in response to someone talking about paywalled content, and not about site features. I would've phrased it very differently (or not replied at all) if they were talking about having more tags to search with.
ETA: Ninja'd, lol.
Changli said:
Yes because I see it almost every time I get a notification about a post in this thread. Thankfully, that post was made in response to someone talking about paywalled content, and not about site features. I would've phrased it very differently (or not replied at all) if they were talking about having more tags to search with.
ETA: Ninja'd, lol.
My bad, sorry for bothering you, I should've read better >_>