imply index_fingers_together -> fingers_together

BUR #9224 has been rejected.

create implication index_fingers_together -> fingers_together

We have 18 pages of posts currently tagged index fingers together without fingers together. I think am implication would help.

e: I just realized that maybe fingers together is supposed to mean that all the fingers are together? In which case the wiki is a little ambiguous. Either way, we also have 44 pages of posts tagged both index fingers together and fingers together, so there should be a ruling one way or the other.

I don't see why we need fingers together when own hands together already exists. I think those two tags should just be aliased.

We have a number of specific finger tags like steepled fingers, index fingers together, interlocked fingers etc, I don't think we need a index fingers together -> fingers together -> own hands together kind of hierarchy.

BUR #9459 has been rejected.

create alias fingers_together -> own_hands_together

nonamethanks said:

I don't see why we need fingers together when own hands together already exists. I think those two tags should just be aliased.

We have a number of specific finger tags like steepled fingers, index fingers together, interlocked fingers etc, I don't think we need a index fingers together -> fingers together -> own hands together kind of hierarchy.

Okay.

Why a nuke instead of an alias? A nuke would never work.

nonamethanks said:

Why a nuke instead of an alias? A nuke would never work.
...

Sorry, I didn't see you said alias. Edited.

Counter proposal: now that pull #5099 has been merged, after the next site update we can turn fingers together into a deprecated tag, given the amount of other specific tags about fingers we have. Especially since "fingers together" in the past was used for holding hands too.

BUR #9686 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

deprecate fingers_together

As above.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #9224 (forum #207411) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

The bulk update request #9686 (forum #209652) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #9459 (forum #208493) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.