Previous: topic #20160
Posted under Tags
Previous: topic #20160
Nameless_Contributor said:
Previous: topic #20160
I did sort out most of the posts manually (a few stumped me), but it's been repopulated since then. That's why I'm suggesting an alias or a distinct definition, because right now it's a tag with no meaning.
The only definition it needs is:
Ambiguous tag. Do not use.
Any other definition would require this tag to have its own unique niche. It would have to describe something that isn't already covered by glint, sparkle, diffraction_spikes, glowing, aura, etc. I have yet to see any posts with this tag where a more specific tag would not apply.