BUR #8277 has been rejected.
create implication fish_in_mouth -> fish
I feel like this one's pretty self-explanatory.
Posted under Tags
Alex_MKW said:
What about when it's food? post #4934586 has taiyaki, unless that doesn't qualify for fish.
That's a good question, although that one is tagged as fish already... I feel like if it isn't worth tagging as fish, it shouldn't be tagged fish_in_mouth either.
DownWithTheThickness said:
That's a good question, although that one is tagged as fish already... I feel like if it isn't worth tagging as fish, it shouldn't be tagged fish_in_mouth either.
I agree since it seems like fish as it is right now is only supposed to be for the animal and not for something shaped like a fish, which in that case I think the alias would be fine. Either that or the wiki for fish should be updated to include fish shaped things like taiyaki.
EDIT: the fish wiki does include a link to tag group:food tags at least.
I honestly kind of hate the way fish is mostly used for fish swimming in the ocean but also includes stuff that bears no resemblance to a living fish, like post #2030406 and post #4681698. It's about as dumb as if we tagged steaks and hamburgers as cow.
There was a suggestion way back in topic #9855 to use fish_(food) in the same manner as chicken_(food). I wonder why that idea was never taken up.
nonamethanks said:
I agree, they definitely should be split. I guess nobody's done it yet because fish is a pretty large tag and not very interesting to most people.
If no one objects, I can start going through and populating a fish (food) tag?
The bulk update request #8277 (forum #202424) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.