Sock implications

BUR #8261 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication ankle_socks -> socks

It's... one type of socks.

Loose socks probably shouldn't imply socks, they are sometimes long enough to count as kneehighs instead (loose_socks kneehighs solo).

Unbreakable said:

Loose socks probably shouldn't imply socks, they are sometimes long enough to count as kneehighs instead (loose_socks kneehighs solo).

Fair enough. Edited.

e: Btw, should tabi count as socks?

The_Bob said:

e: Btw, should tabi count as socks?

Not when artists draw them extending to the knee or beyond.

iridescent_slime said:

Not when artists draw them extending to the knee or beyond.

Okay, thanks! Might do some manual sock tagging for short tabi later, then.

I feel like there's a lot of thighhighs in toe_socks?

heartattack said:

I feel like there's a lot of thighhighs in toe_socks?

Darn, you're right. Okay, I'll take those out too.

Unbreakable said:

Loose socks probably shouldn't imply socks, they are sometimes long enough to count as kneehighs instead (loose_socks kneehighs solo).

Doesn't the same go for tube socks?

skylightcrystal said:

Doesn't the same go for tube socks?

...can I at least keep the ankle socks implication? orz

The_Bob said:

...can I at least keep the ankle socks implication? orz

Yeah, that one shouldn't be a problem.

The bulk update request #8261 (forum #202343) has been approved by @evazion.