Should male_focus still be tagged when the focus is on male(s) characters, even if there's a noticeable female presence?

From male focus wiki

Images featuring only male characters, or with an overwhelming emphasis on male characters. Do not use on male-to-female genderswaps, or any image with an easily noticeable female presence.

This clause was added back in 2011, and we all agree with the first part, but this line is questionable

or any image with an easily noticeable female presence.

Consider images where the focus is heavily on the male, but with a female presence, should the male focus tag really not be used in those cases?
Here's some examples I quickly pulled up.

• post #4675996
• post #4628599
• post #4602780 (nsfw bara)

If we all agree that it should still be tagged, then to what extent and how should we phrase that on the wiki?

Yeah I don't think anyone could disagree those are male focus. Removed that clause.

This clause was added back when the tag was still called "male", and there were people using "male" for any post with a male in it. It got renamed to male_focus in topic #11214.