Posted under Tags
BUR #6203 has been rejected.
create alias areola_slip -> areola_peek
the definition of areola_slip sounds quite analogous to panty_peek, and doesn't seem to require any 'slippage' for a post to qualify, so for the sake of consistency and correctness I think it should be _peek
bipface said:
BUR #6203 has been rejected.
create alias areola_slip -> areola_peek
the definition of areola_slip sounds quite analogous to panty_peek, and doesn't seem to require any 'slippage' for a post to qualify, so for the sake of consistency and correctness I think it should be
_peek
This should be done with an alias instead of a mass update. The latter would, among other things, leave the areola slip wiki orphaned, and also fail to move 'subscribed'/blacklisted tags over.
Though I would disagree with it even in that case. Areola slip is named analogously to nipple slip. It might not involve actual literal "slippage", but most people use "slip" that way anyway in "areola slip" and "nipple slip", so the context is clear.
Fixed it to be an alias. But I agree with NNescio, it would not make sense to have nipple slip and areola slip named differently.
The bulk update request #6203 (forum #190890) has been rejected by @bipface.
