Donmai

Implicate single_epaulette -> epaulettes

Posted under Tags

BUR #5303 has been approved by @evazion.

Show

create implication single_earring -> earrings
create implication single_pauldron -> pauldrons
create implication single_thigh_boot -> thigh_boots
create implication single_wrist_cuff -> wrist_cuffs
create implication single_knee_pad -> knee_pads
create implication single_garter_strap -> garter_straps
create implication single_knee_boot -> knee_boots
create implication single_arm_warmer -> arm_warmers
create implication single_elbow_pad -> elbow_pads
create implication single_over-kneehigh -> over-kneehighs
create implication single_vambrace -> vambraces
create implication single_half_glove -> half_gloves
create implication single_greave -> greaves
create implication single_slipper -> slippers
create implication single_mitten -> mittens
create implication single_antler -> antlers

This BUR should give most single tags the appropriate implication. However, this is by no means a final version, as there were a couple I was unsure about:

- The single_bare_* tags. I figure for the more "fetish-y" tags, for lack of a better term, having the distinction between single or not may actually hold value. (Same logic for single_inverted_nipple)

- single_sidelock and single_hair_intake.

- single_legging.

Here's a list of single* tags I'm not sure even need to exist:

Show

single_gold_tooth
single_wide_sleeve
single_headphone
single_hand
single_bang
single_drill
single_garter (leg garters are usually single by default, the rest could probably be replaced with thigh_strap or single_garter_strap. For true garters, a search with single_thighhigh should work.)

And these tags *could* use an implication, but would need some cleanup before doing so:
- single_tooth
- single_tear

Looking to hear any thoughts people may have.

skylightcrystal said:

single headphone is obviously being used for a set of headphones that only covers one ear. This definitely justifies its own tag, even if (or arguably especially because) it is rare. It's too small to justify an implication, though.

Sorry, forgot to explain that one. The thing about single headphones is that I've pretty much only ever seen them on headsets, which is an existing tag, but the two examples in the tag don't have the microphone that is typically present on headsets. I wasn't sure if having a mic was a requirement for the headset tag. (Another possibility would be to have single headphone be a subset of the headset tag.)

1