BUR #4819 has been rejected.
create implication very_wide_shot -> wide_shot
I assume this works like very long hair and long hair.
Posted under Tags
BUR #4819 has been rejected.
create implication very_wide_shot -> wide_shot
I assume this works like very long hair and long hair.
Not necessarily, huge breasts doesn't imply large breasts because breast sizes are all considered separate categories.
These tags are part of a spectrum based on how close the camera is to the character:
This is kind of like saying wide shot should imply full body, because a wide shot means the character's full body is visible. Yes, but the point of these tags is to make a distinction in how far away the camera is.
evazion said:
These tags are part of a spectrum based on how close the camera is to the character:
[snip]
This is kind of like saying wide shot should imply full body, because a wide shot means the character's full body is visible. Yes, but the point of these tags is to make a distinction in how far away the camera is.
I've personally always seen them as two different categories -
From close-up to cowboy shot, the camera has to be close. But you can still achieve feet out of frame with a wide shot (eg. post #4388674). I thought full body didn't have any camera distance restrictions either.
From wide shot onwards, the focus is on the distance from the subject, but that doesn't mean the entire subject has to be visible (eg. post #4169448?)
With that said, i understand what you mean, but i still think very wide shots should appear in a wide shot search.
The bulk update request #4819 (forum #181452) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.