Beam disambiguation

BUR #4699 has been rejected.

create alias beam_(steel) -> steel_beam
create alias beam -> beam_(energy)

I'm not sure if the second is correct. The wiki says that it's not just for energy beams, but also for light or "other energy/liquid".
(Aliasing because of 200 post limit)

And I'm not sure about the first one. You get plenty of wooden beams in construction as well, after all.

If you're trying to get steel_beam to come up then surely beam_(steel) would be better than beam_(construction)

skylightcrystal said:

If you're trying to get steel_beam to come up then surely beam_(steel) would be better than beam_(construction)

Fair point, although a bit ambiguous.

perhaps beam_(architecture) if we were generalizing the material?

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #4699 (forum #180740) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

Aliasing beam -> beam (energy) doesn't make sense when we already have energy beam for energy beams and sunbeam for light beams. Beam is just a redundant tag.