As it stands, minus a tanline, is there any discernable difference between the "dark skin" and "tan" tags?
The wiki currently defines "tan" as "Skin darkened due to exposure to the sun." Typically, a tan is discernable by the presence of tanlines. Minus any visible tanlines, there doesn't seem to be any distinguishable difference between "tan" and "dark skin," as a tan without tanlines would just be "skin that is darker in tone than the usual Caucasian/East Asian skintone."
Currently...
post #2409537
post #3588629
post #3548557
post #2917771
post #2802582 *
...meet the definition of "dark skin," but can not be identifiably tanned from sun exposure, and therefore do not fit the definition of "tan."
*(oh hey! post #2802583 ...no tanlines!)
And therefore share the same tag as:
post #3534348
post #2943290
post #2904292
post #3094960
post #2659310
Should the definition of "tan" just be changed to... skin that happens to be tan in color, and perhaps redefine the "dark skin" tag to be skin that is darker than tan? I know that can be subjective, but as it stands I feel like "dark skin" is incredibly vague, and basically seems to be used for any character that doesn't have a pale complexion.