Licking_penis implications

BUR #3409 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication licking_penis -> penis
create implication licking_penis -> licking

Thought the tag could use some implications.

I think the tag itself should be used when the tongue is visible, so I thought tongue_out is an appropriate implication to add as well.

I also just made a temporary wiki for licking_penis. Do let me know if there's any problem with it.

EDIT: The bulk update request #3409 (forum #172409) has been approved by @evazion.

Wouldn't tongue_out conflict with x-ray penis licking?

I agree with implicating penis and licking, but not tongue out. The latter tag is usually applicable, but it's not a given.

There are cases like that post #4081242 / post #3857159, where I guess it´s clear that there´s some licking going on, but the tongue is not visible. Or we make it clear, that every of that tags should be visible when tagging it.
So I agree with Obstetrics. It shouldn´t imply tongue_out.

I understand. In that case I agree that tongue_out shouldn't be implicated.

Edit: I removed it from the BUR.

Technically there are a few posts under licking_penis bulge and licking_penis erection_under_clothes where the actual penis isn't visible, and therefore shouldn't be tagged:

• post #3649124
• post #3256882
• post #3469499

I'm going to say that "licking penis through clothes" should be tagged something else for the sake of this implication going through, just like cunnilingus through clothes has its own tag.

The bulk update request #3409 (forum #172409) has been approved by @evazion.