[APPROVED] Animals on body parts

BUR #2207 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication cat_on_lap -> cat
create implication cat_on_lap -> animal_on_lap
create implication bird_on_shoulder -> bird
create implication bird_on_shoulder -> animal_on_shoulder
create implication bird_on_arm -> bird
create implication bird_on_arm -> animal_on_arm
create implication bird_on_finger -> bird

Reason: Similar to implications from cat_on_head to cat and on_head and from animal_on_head to animal (and a whole load of others).

There is no animal on finger tag.

I'm not fully convinced that everything that gets tagged with bird_on_x warrants the animal tag, but the implication is already there for bird on head to bird and animal on head and thus animal, so may as well be consistant.

EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2207 (forum #161606) has been approved by @evazion.

I'm against implying more things to animal. It doesn't make much sense to imply random tags to animal when animals themselves don't imply animal. It creates a weird situation where bird on arm would imply animal but bird itself does not. Most of the animal implications we do have were added at random, without much consideration for how the tag should work overall.

Other than that implication (animal on arm -> animal), I'm fine with the rest.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

Edited the request to remove the animal_on_arm to animal one.

BUR #2275 has been approved by @evazion.

remove implication animal_around_neck -> animal
remove implication animal_on_hand -> animal
remove implication animal_on_lap -> animal
remove implication animal_on_shoulder -> animal
remove implication animal_on_head -> animal

Reason:

EDIT: The bulk update request #2275 (forum #162966) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #2207 (forum #161606) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #2275 (forum #162966) has been approved by @evazion.

The tag implication bird_on_shoulder -> animal_on_shoulder has been rejected by @evazion.

bird_on_shoulder -> animal_on_shoulder was a duplicate implication, it was previously done in topic #9478.