Is there any value to a thagomizer tag? Or is it just tag padding for stegosaurus posts? If this tag were created by an ordinary Member I'd have summarily nuked it, but it wasn't so I guess I'll do the nice thing and ask here first.
Posted under General
Is there any value to a thagomizer tag? Or is it just tag padding for stegosaurus posts? If this tag were created by an ordinary Member I'd have summarily nuked it, but it wasn't so I guess I'll do the nice thing and ask here first.
You can have pictures of a stegosaurus without that part being visible (post #1109565 is an example of where it's missing, post #3331629 is an example where it is hidden from view), and it has a pretty distinctive appearance so if someone who was familiar with the term saw it being drawn on a non-stegosaurus it could easily be tagged there.
I'd say keep the tag.
Corona hair bun, is this a good enough tag to keep?
Unbreakable said:
What's wrong with this one? I don't think it can be replicated with a search.
Unbreakable said:
I was asking it was useful enough to keep, tags are supposed to be useful, not just exist because no other tag works for it.
It's a fetish tag. It's as useful as facial or cum_on_hair. We don't have tags for tentacle vaginas, and tentacle_sex applies to any kind of sex with tentacles, so yes, it's useful.
Unbreakable said:
It feels like that one ought to get rolled into or or aliased with costume_switch. I'm not sure the "video game character" and "switch with another character from the same game" on this one make a lot of sense as tag criteria.
Unbreakable said:
Corona hair bun, is this a good enough tag to keep?
maybe we could start hair_bun_ornament to cover that and post with hair ornament stick on hair bun that isn't bun_cover? (post #2320256 post #3319789 post #3370167)
I just stumbled upon the tag anal_object_push, what the heck is this even supposed to be? I didn't see it in the report but the second-oldest post was 4 years ago and the recent use was probably a mistag of anal_object_insertion which exists on all but 4 of the tag's posts anyway.
Bump.
There is still a problem with the rename command in Bulk Update Requests ("BURs"), example, rename reu -> reu_(cookie) results in the system ("DanbooruBot") being incorrectly reported as creating a new tag or repopulating an old tag, instead of being reported as BUR tags (here is the BUR and here is the report).
Travley_Hypocrite said:
Bump.
There is still a problem with the
renamecommand in Bulk Update Requests ("BURs"), example,rename reu -> reu_(cookie)results in the system ("DanbooruBot") being incorrectly reported as creating a new tag or repopulating an old tag, instead of being reported as BUR tags (here is the BUR and here is the report).
Gotta ping @BrokenEagle98 for that.
Unbreakable said:
Dot mouth, this tag has been killed several times in the past but keeps being populated now and then, is it a useful tag or should it keep getting nuked?
Seems like it's been used by several different individuals, most of whom are experienced enough at tagging that I'd hesitate before reverting their edits. It obviously isn't just someone's pet tag or one that will only ever be used on a handful of posts.
chilled_sake said:
i don't know how else one could find pictures with dot mouths, much like with dot nose
I've tagged these faces with :x before, for lack of a better alternative, but I've never been happy about having to do so. Dot_mouth is much more descriptive.
iridescent_slime said:
Seems like it's been used by several different individuals, most of whom are experienced enough at tagging that I'd hesitate before reverting their edits. It obviously isn't just someone's pet tag or one that will only ever be used on a handful of posts.
It's a surprise it took this long for someone to care about it then but I see your point, I won't remove it from valid posts.