Donmai

Ignore this topic. Mistakes were made.

Posted under Tags

BUR #2070 has been rejected.

create implication ak-5 -> fn_fnc
mass update ak-5 -> ak_5
mass update ak5_(girls_frontline) -> ak_5_(girls_frontline)
create implication carl_gustav_m/45 -> submachine_gun
mass update carl_gustav_m/45 -> carl_gustaf_m/45
create implication carl_gustaf_recoilless_rifle -> recoilless_rifle

Reason: The tag ak-5 has been used for the Swedish version of FN FNC, but that's not how the weapon is designated. It's designated Ak 5 (with a space, not a dash) and the tag should be changed to match that.

The character based on the weapon is also wrongly tagged as ak5_(girls_frontline), even though she has the correct designation in the game.

Ak 5 has some distinct visual differences from the original FN FNC, but it's still highly likely that anyone searching for FN FNC would like to see its variants as well. Therefore I suggest that Ak 5 should imply FN FNC. That way Ak 5 would also by extension imply assault_rifle.

I recently made a request to rename the tag m45 on the forum which was approved (topic #16257). But Carl_Gustav_m/45 should be spelled "Gustaf", because the weapon is named after its manufacturer Carl Gustafs Stads Gevärsfaktori.

Carl Gustaf m/45 should of course imply submachine_gun, because it's a submachine gun.

I recently added the tag Carl_Gustaf_recoilless_rifle and as the name implies it should imply recoilless_rifle.

EDIT: This tag implication is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: This tag implication has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The tag implication ak_5 -> fn_fnc (forum #158705) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Huh... I thought it would make a new post with the title I gave. I only referred to this topic because it demanded that there be a topic for the implication ak-5 -> fn_fnc. I guess it was really saying that such an implication already had a topic...

I've made multiple topics before I realized what a BUR was.
Here are the others, feel free to remove them:
topic #16253
topic #16254
topic #16256

And then there's this one that was already approved and is referenced in the BUR description:
topic #16257

Updated

1