[REJECTED] [BUR] basic taxonomy implications

BUR #1997 has been rejected.

create implication cat -> animal
create implication dog -> animal
create implication bunny -> animal
create implication horse -> animal
create implication lizard -> animal
create implication bird -> animal
create implication fish -> animal

Reason: Some simple biology categorization. This is a result of me noticing today that penguin implies bird, but bird doesn't imply animal

- There's alot more that could be added, these are just the major ones I noticed.
- Humans are exempt, because that would be crazy.
- Possibly should create a mammal tag, then imply cat, dog etc to mammal, then mammal to animal
- insect -> animal isn't included, it seems like a very large portion of posts tagged insect feature a butterfly hair ornament or butterfly print. There might be some similar issues for other tags, which might be a good reason not to do this.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1997 (forum #156030) has been rejected by @NWF_Renim.

I don't know about other users but I only use the animal tag when there is a living animal in the image, not if it's a statue or anything else.

It was previously rejected by jxh as well (topic #8076 and topic #6220). Although a long time ago and a literal reading of the reasoning should no longer apply due to changes since then, the basic point is much the same as Unbreakable's one above.

A domesticated feline mammal present in an image. This tag can also be used with cat shaped stuffed animals, cat demons/monsters, and bodiless cat heads.

If it were only up to me, I would only apply cat to depictions of real animals (and possibly magical cats such as chomusuke). But considering the cat tag is defined to include things which aren't animals, I suppose doing this would be a mistake.

I've noticed this issue when I went to tag an image with dog on head, which implicates animal on head and therefore adds the animal tag.

Images with dogs that don't have the dog on head tag (due to either not being in the image or the tagger being unaware the tag existed) wouldn't get tagged with animal, which would affect searches.

The bulk update request #1997 (forum #156030) has been rejected by @NWF_Renim.