[REJECTED] alias huge_ahoge -> long_ahoge

BUR #1949 has been rejected.

remove implication huge_ahoge -> ahoge
create alias huge_ahoge -> long_ahoge
create implication long_ahoge -> ahoge

Reason: Alternatively we could have a long ahoge and an additional very long ahoge if it's needed

EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1949 (forum #154736) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

-1. I think the more ambiguous nature of the wording huge or large is better, as it would allow for those that might not be necessarily longer than a common ahoge, but is perhaps extremely wider/thicker than normal ones.

NWF_Renim said:

-1. I think the more ambiguous nature of the wording huge or large is better, as it would allow for those that might not be necessarily longer than a common ahoge, but is perhaps extremely wider/thicker than normal ones.

Are there examples of this, and wouldn't it be better to tag such posts as wide_ahoge or such? Also, would you not allow for at least some degrees? So if this alias is rejected, having large ahoge and huge ahoge.

post #1658973 was one of the clearer examples of an image in the huge ahoge tag which is obviously not long and also is not a mistag.

Incidentally, even if this doesn't go through it may be worth considering removing the implication to ahoge anyway as huge ahoge could be part of antenna hair which is not usually tagged with ahoge. About 3% of huge ahoge images at present are tagged with antenna hair, whether solo or otherwise, and there are other images in the tag which don't have antenna hair but should do.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #1949 (forum #154736) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.