[REJECTED] eliminating eyebrows_visible_through_hair and useless tags

So, as an experiment, I created a simple wiki page for eyebrows behind hair and started tagging posts with it. I went through the images uploaded on the past day with -eyebrow_visible_through_hair and, although I surely missed some, I found only about 30 of them, hidden within a multitude of untagged eyebrows visible through hair. This confirmed my suspicions that

1) The subversion of the transparent hair trope is much rarer than the trope itself; and

2) Tagging its absence would be much easier, it would only need to become well-known.

indexador2 said:

So, as an experiment, I created a simple wiki page for eyebrows behind hair and started tagging posts with it. I went through the images uploaded on the past day with -eyebrow_visible_through_hair and, although I surely missed some, I found only about 30 of them, hidden within a multitude of untagged eyebrows visible through hair. This confirmed my suspicions that

1) The subversion of the transparent hair trope is much rarer than the trope itself; and

2) Tagging its absence would be much easier, it would only need to become well-known.

I wish to highlight that eyebrow_visible_through_hair and eyebrows behind hair are not mutually exclusive.

I still can't see why would anyone need either tags though.

Vezral said:

I still can't see why would anyone need either tags though.

Why not? Tagging the exception is what we usually do when the opposite is too common, it's nothing new.

Unbreakable said:

Why not? Tagging the exception is what we usually do when the opposite is too common, it's nothing new.

Wanting to see pics without visible eyebrows is a niche among niches.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #1827 (forum #151508) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.