Made a new pool, what do you guys think?

Sorry if I’m doing this wrong, I haven’t posted on the forums before..

There’s a certain thing I’ve noticed being illustrated/uploaded. I don’t really know how to explain it correctly, and I don’t think there’s a name for it either, so I made a pool for it! I thought it might be a good idea, so I went ahead and made it and added a couple pieces, but I’d like to know if you guys think it’s a good addition or not. If it is, is there anything that needs to be changed in any way?

Be as harsh as you wish, I won’t take any offense..

pool #13542

I like the idea. Can you find more examples?

The "get your mind out of the gutter" comment is kinda pointless and might insult someone with an unusually tight ass. I would cut it but its not a biggie.

• Aside from dress/skirt, do cape, coat/jacket, cloak... and other clothing count?

post #2162619, post #2127578, post #2972523
post #2989476, post #2976458, post #1592166

• Can unsual objects come out of the skirt/dress be qualified or just scenery (star/sky_print + unmoving_pattern) only?

post #3033536, post #2737992
post #2112926
post #692195

I'd add in this pool dresses with a "view" on outer side of dress. There was few examples and even idea to start a pool for stuff like that but there neither was enough critical mass to start a pool nor idea was certain enough at the moment.
Examples: post #733104, post #2543057

I'll hold up 'till certain approval or rejection.

ion288 said:

The "get your mind out of the gutter" comment is kinda pointless and might insult someone with an unusually tight ass.

This was something I noted as well. Besides that, rarely should 2nd person ever be used on this site for pool descriptions or wiki entries. Instead, 3rd, 4th, or no person are more preferable.

I asked about it in topic #12251 (forum #143880) and got double_exposure (forum #143882) and portal_(object) (forum #143883) as responses.

kittey said:

I asked about it in topic #12251 (forum #143880) and got double_exposure (forum #143882) and portal_(object) (forum #143883) as responses.

Maybe it's better to use multiple exposure for this and not double exposure.
Double exposure looks more like an effect and multiple exposure is the general term:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_exposure

DeadW@nderer said:

I'd add in this pool dresses with a "view" on outer side of dress. There was few examples and even idea to start a pool for stuff like that but there neither was enough critical mass to start a pool nor idea was certain enough at the moment.
Examples: post #733104, post #2543057

I'll hold up 'till certain approval or rejection.

Yeah, I did intend for that to count. I should probably revise the pool’s description to make it clear images like that are allowed. I’ll add those as well!

yelite said:

• Aside from dress/skirt, do cape, coat/jacket, cloak... and other clothing count?

post #2162619, post #2127578, post #2972523
post #2989476, post #2976458, post #1592166

• Can unsual objects come out of the skirt/dress be qualified or just scenery (star/sky_print + unmoving_pattern) only?

post #3033536, post #2737992
post #2112926
post #692195

Should I just remove this pool and make one for any odd clothing of this caliber?

ScientificallyPissed said:

Should I just remove this pool and make one for any odd clothing of this caliber?

You can just rename it if needed, no need to remove it and make a new one.

And +1 for making it a more general one.

Why should it be a pool? Seems to be objectively taggable, so it should be a tag instead?

Overhauled the pool to allow all types of clothing. If there's anything I need to change, please tell me!

kittey said:

Why should it be a pool? Seems to be objectively taggable, so it should be a tag instead?

There doesn't really seem to be a general term for it, and if there is, nobody knows it. double_exposure is completely different from this, by the way. This isn't just a pool for artwork overlaid onto other works of art, after all!

Added a description to double_exposure

As for the pool, I understand it as specifically collecting images where different worlds or environments can be seen within the surface of a component or object. While all images in the pool can potentially have double_exposure (or superimposed if it existed), not all images with the tag would fit into the pool.