[APPROVED] Tag implication: dx -> >_<

create implication dx -> >_<

Link to implication

DX is a D: face while making >_< eyes. The inverse of XD.

The tag implication dx -> >_< has been approved.

Welp, another face I'll have to consider using.

I'm +0 on this, since I'd just like to know if the tag is useful enough to permit further adoption. There's the potential for "dx" to be confused for other things, because I definitely didn't see that face at first.

create implication dx -> d:

Link to request

+1 to the above and adding the other obvious implication.

The bulk update request #1161 has been approved.

I agree with both. Pretty obvious imo.

+1 on both implications.
Besides being obvious, XD also implicates both > < and :D, so I think the inverse should have its own proper implications.

The tag implication dx -> >_< has been approved.

What about the other one?

The bulk update request #1161 has been approved.