[REJECTED] Tag implication: shorts_under_skirt -> skirt

create implication shorts_under_skirt -> skirt

Link to implication

One subset.
The skirt tag is also defined by now.
I'll leave out the implication to shorts, since bike_shorts do not imply shorts currently.

EDIT: The tag implication shorts_under_skirt -> skirt has been rejected by @Type-kun.

Clean up the tag first.

A lot of posts in the tag search {shorts_under_skirt dress} should be tagged shorts_under_dress instead.

BrokenEagle98 said:

Clean up the tag first.

A lot of posts in the tag search {shorts_under_skirt dress} should be tagged shorts_under_dress instead.

For that matter should shorts under dress just alias to shorts under skirt in the same way we have uspkirt but no updress? I'm not committed to that, just asking before we think about approving this implication.

Yes I do believe so. It would fall in line with other similar tags...

• dress_basket -> skirt_basket
• dress_hold -> skirt_hold

Also if only the lower body is shown, then you could see shorts under skirt without knowing whether it really is a dress or a skirt.

The tag implication shorts_under_skirt -> skirt has been rejected by @Type-kun.