[bulk] unalias web address > watermark

remove alias web_address -> watermark

Link to request

post #2642851 has a web address that clearly isn't a watermark.

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1112 (forum #127563) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

One example isn't enough to conclusively state that this implication has a problem, create a new tag if that's the only image where a url is shown that isn't used as a watermark.

Other examples: post #2104878, post #1921570, post #705584, post #521377, and post #97925.

Log said:

One example isn't enough to conclusively state that this implication has a problem, create a new tag if that's the only image where a url is shown that isn't used as a watermark.

Would it be sufficient to divide them between web address watermark and web address? There would be no ambiguity about the one that implies watermark. I don't think w.a.w. should imply w.m. either, just either or.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #1112 (forum #127563) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.