Tag implication: airplane_interior -> airplane

create implication airplane_interior -> airplane

Link to implication

Similar to church_interior and train_interior.

+1, makes sense...

-1, while it is inside the airplane, you can't actually see the airplane. Having it implicate the airplane will merely add noise to the tag as the object isn't actually visible and the visuals are completely different.

The train_interior's implication to the train tag is already adding unnecessary noise to the ground_vehicle tag.

I've always wondered why we have those implications in place anyway. When I search car I'd ideally like to see the full car, not just the inside of it. It seems a bit wrong to me.

So goes for the other implications for vehicle interiors we have.

Should the (train_interior -> train) implication be therefore removed...?

I'd definitely support removing the train_interior -> train implication.

Also the car_interior -> car implication, at minimum the car_interior tag seems a bit broader than just cars, and includes things like vans and trucks as well.

remove implication train_interior -> train
remove implication car_interior -> car

Link to request

Just throwing this into the conversation for comment...

Also agree that it's difficult to tell the vehicle type from just the interior of the vehicle.

Well, the plane tag doesn't really care and shouldn't care if the plane is viewed from the inside or outside.
It is more like a special case, because it is so rare that somrthing is inside a plane/train that it could deserve its own tag ald also implication.
But ok, I wonder why @albert did approve those things in the past.

The tag implication airplane_interior -> airplane has been rejected.

The bulk update request #1007 has been approved.

Removed the implications, but someone should manually clean it up now.

remove implication church_interior -> church
remove implication bus_interior -> bus

Link to request

Just to make this complete.

The bulk update request #1031 has been approved.