[bulk] Jack o' lantern thingies

create implication jack-o'-lantern_earrings -> earrings
create implication jack-o'-lantern_earrings -> jack-o'-lantern
create implication jack-o'-lantern_hair_ornament -> hair_ornament
create implication jack-o'-lantern_hair_ornament -> jack-o'-lantern

Link to request

Two implications should be obvious, because subsets.
I wonder abot the implication to jack-'o-lantern. I suggest them, because I think that jack-'o-lantern is more of a symbol and doesn't essentially have to be a pumpkin. We have for example pumpkin_earrings for that if the earrings aren't in the shape of a jack-'o-lantern.

Why make implications for tags that aren't even used?

I've put the ' wrong.

Oh okay.

I saw you removed pumpkin_earrings from post #2542258 replacing it with jack-o'-lantern_earrings. It's of little consequence to me personally, but wouldn't pumpkin earrings apply there too? I mean after all a jack-o'-lantern is simply a face or other design carved onto a pumpkin and, hence, anything that incorporates one also incorporates a pumpkin.

sweetpe@ said:

I mean after all a jack-o'-lantern is simply a face or other design carved onto a pumpkin and, hence, anything that incorporates one also incorporates a pumpkin.

I agree that pumpkin_earrings could also apply to that post, but the jack-o'-lantern face is sometimes placed on non-pumpkin-shaped objects. There's a lot of overlap, but it wouldn't be an implication.

The bulk update request #962 has been approved.