[bulk] Black cat with black fur

create implication black_cat -> black_fur
create implication black_fur -> fur

Link to request

Wiki page of black cat says that it's a cat with black fur.

Now the promblem ist if this implication is neccessary since every color-specific fur tag looks underused with black fur (42) with the highest tag count.

fur

Items of clothing made from fur.

So black cats are items of clothing?

Well, I don't know about this wiki entry. I know this, but doesn't this look incomplete? Does this means that this cat here has no fur? post #780999 or post #1516362,

I'd otherwise tag it with furry, if the furry wiki wouldn't say this: "Anthropomorphic animals."

There should certainly be a tag for visible fur on animals, and a different tag for fur-based clothing.

perhaps move the current use of fur to "fur clothes" (the likes of fur trim and fur hat could then implicate this), then use "fur" for animal fur. I still don't think that black cat should be implicated to it though - as I would only say to tag images as such if the fur is actually drawn, so not just a cat coloured black.

for example:
not fur - post #2446376, post #2429155 or most drawings of sakamoto_(nichijou)
with fur - the one you linked, or (for a black cat example) post #2313497

The bulk update request #850 has been rejected.