create implication bomber_jacket -> jacket
Posted under Tags
create implication bomber_jacket -> jacket
imho, one shouldn't shy away from creating a wiki. easiest is just rip from a dictionary or a reference book. oftentimes, meanings are redefined, changed or became obsolete. so a good wiki today, may not be the same tomorrow. nobody would blame you for writing the wiki of an existing tag. complains and other issues will be settled or raised later on. the community will help you improve it, if it needs to be.
just for an example:
MW said:
a short jacket that is made of leather and fits closely around the waist
OD said:
A short jacket similar to a flight jacket, but with a thick lining typically of sheepskin.
AHD said:
A short sturdy jacket traditionally made of leather and having a fitted or elastic waist, a zippered front, and often a fleece or pile collar. Also called flight jacket.
Dictionary.com said:
a jacket, often made of leather with ribbed trim, resembling those worn by World War II bomber crews.
Wikipedia said:
The flight jacket, bomber jacket, or bombardier jacket refers to a garment jacket type originally created for military pilots. They eventually became part of popular culture and apparel.
The two most historical and well-known American flight jackets are the A-2 jacket and the G-1.
All A-2 jackets had several distinguishing characteristics: a snap-flap patch pocket on either side that does not have hand warmer compartments (hands in pockets were considered unfit for a military bearing), a shirt-style snap-down collar, shoulder straps, knit cuffs and waistband, a back constructed from a single piece of leather to limit stress on the garment, and a lightweight silk or cotton inner lining with a leather hang strap (not a loop) and military spec tag attached just below the back collar.
The "G-1" military flight jacket is the commonly accepted name for the fur-lined-collar World War II-era flight jacket of the United States Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard.
for illustrative purposes: post #958100 (non-fur-trimmed) post #1750521 (fur_trim)
ghostrigger said:
imho, one shouldn't shy away from creating a wiki. easiest is just rip from a dictionary or a reference book. oftentimes, meanings are redefined, changed or became obsolete. so a good wiki today, may not be the same tomorrow. nobody would blame you for writing the wiki of an existing tag. complains and other issues will be settled or raised later on. the community will help you improve it, if it needs to be.
just for an example:
for illustrative purposes: post #958100 (non-fur-trimmed) post #1750521 (fur_trim)
You're definitely right.
Alright, I just copy and paste one of those :3.