Donmai

Tag implication: tank_top -> sleeveless_shirt

Posted under Tags

kuuderes_shadow said:

It's a dress, though. Not a vest and a skirt.

Did that say the artist? Because if so, then ok. Otherwise, this wouldn't make much sense because of the belt.
But this isn't much of a topic here, that's more for how to tag this and was meant to also drag "vest" into this discussion. Wasn't well done, but ok.

So.... if sleeveless dress implies "sleeveless", then why shouldn't tanktop and vest do the same which are by their definition sleeveless garments.

Sleeveless is defined like this here:
The lack of sleeves on a garment worn the upper body, often revealing bare shoulders and arms.

->
1. A garment -> If there are multiple garments, then it shouldn't matter. Every single garment need to be looked at seperately
2. Often revealing =/= Everytime
So if there is a vest and a long-sleeved shirt, then by this definition, we have to see that there are two garments and the vest has no sleeves (no sleeves is aliased to sleeveless). Bare shoulders aren't necessary.
So either we have to adjust the definition or the implication should be done.

Updated

1