Probably that, and 99.9% sure no (both before and after checking).
Yes, that Anzu. Should tags of human beings be categorized as artist or character? If there isn't on for Anzu I will probably make it as I have seen a few different artist depictions of her. Something about her is very special to some and they make tributes to her in that way.
There're real life and real life insert tags for this and a character tag won't hurt. However, why is post #2404934 tagged pokemon? The only relate to Pokemon and her is the t-shirt she's wearing in the original photo that isn't appeared in the fanart.
I believe the shirt to be a reference to something in the pokemon franchise, similar to the "R" shirt for team rocket. I'm waiting for a response from the artist on that before I make that change.
Provence said:
I added the commentary (which contains the Pokemon part now) and changed the Copyright to "Original".
Hmm didn't realize you could embed links into commentary.
I'd use them, but one question: The post under these tags are depicting characters that have animal_ears and not pointy/normal ears. So does that still fall under that?
I'd use them, but one question: The post under these tags are depicting characters that have animal_ears and not pointy/normal ears. So does that still fall under that?
Is this pose (and others like it) knee_up, leg_up or leg_lift? The tags seems kinda overlapping and confusing to me and all those tags turn up similar pics.