[bulk] too_many subsets

create implication too_many_cats -> too_many
create implication too_many_frills -> too_many
create implication too_many_books -> book
create implication too_many_books -> too_many
create implication too_many_sex_toys -> too_many
create implication too_many_knives -> knife
create implication too_many_knives -> too_many
create implication too_many_chicks -> too_many
create implication too_many_bunnies -> too_many
create implication too_many_bats -> too_many
create implication too_many_birds -> too_many
create implication too_many_pikachu -> too_many
create implication too_many_hearts -> heart
create implication too_many_hearts -> too_many
create implication too_many_scoops -> too_many

Link to request

All are subsets of too many, though these are only the tags with 20+ posts. Also implicating some to what they represent too many of, where such implications don't already exist.

EDIT: Thought I'd already checked these for existing implications.... Oh well. Requested edited.

Just a thought: what if too many was only intended to be used as a catchall for images that don't seem to fit any of the existing too_many_* tags? I'm not saying this is what that tag should be used for (I use it alongside the more specific tags on a regular basis), but there seems to be a tradition here of only using one tag or the other.

Yeah, that thought crossed my mind at one point. Indeed, that's part of why I sent in this request: to get some discussion on the subject going. Well, that and thinking, "Why not? The worst albert can do is say 'no'."

Now that I think of it, though, I probably should've split off the ones that aren't going toward too many, and put them in a separate update request (pointing to the same thread, of course). Oh well, if this one doesn't go through, I can always submit a second request with just those few.

Bulk update request #334 failed: Error: Antecedent name has already been taken (create implication too_many_chicks -> chick)

The bulk update request #334 has been approved.