With the current definition of the tag, only images that have sequential imaging qualify for the tag, but artists on pixiv tend to utilize the image collection feature to separate their comic frames, which end up getting treated as non-comics here (but are still tagged as comics by the artists themselves and act as comics in usage). Also, the requirement that something sequential or potentially paneling be present to qualify for the tag seems to ignore that a comic can exist in a single panel form (there have been plenty of newspaper comics that have only used a single panel). This would seem that our current definition and usage of the tag is therefore a bit off, or that our tag is misnamed.
This is for the benefit of another user, as they questioned our current usage for the comic tag. The user said his English wasn't good enough to hold a discussion (relying on google translator as a crutch apparently) and that he likewise didn't visit the forum frequently, but still wanted to voice his issue with our usage of the tag.