Tag implication: kirito_(sao-ggo) -> kirito

create implication kirito_(sao-ggo) -> kirito

Link to implication

because is kirito

-1 because they're visually distinct.

Er... But every kirito_(sao-ggo) is tagged as kirito anyway

Why does a kirito tag without qualifiers exist? It's an ambiguous tag name.

S1eth said:

Why does a kirito tag without qualifiers exist? It's an ambiguous tag name.

Seems most off the SAO avatar names are this way: Agil, Heathcliff, Klein, Lisbeth, Silica... Guess it just hasn't come up as a conflict so far in anyone's minds.

MagicalAsparagus said:

Er... But every kirito_(sao-ggo) is tagged as kirito anyway

well, if it's working close this petition. But I upladed one with kirito_(sao-ggo) and doesn't work the implication, so why I'm here.

S1eth said:

Why does a kirito tag without qualifiers exist? It's an ambiguous tag name.

We only recently started moving single name tags and have barely touched the As, there' no way we would have touched the Ks.

I've been doing random single name tag moves if you would like me to mass update kirito to kirito_(sao). I'm not familiar with SAO, so I wouldn't know how the implications would work.

FinderX said:

well, if it's working close this petition. But I upladed one with kirito_(sao-ggo) and doesn't work the implication, so why I'm here.

He means every post with kirito_(sao-ggo) is getting tagged with kirito, not that it's automatically getting tagged that. Was probably a response to Ironbottom that they're tagged together as is, despite being visually distinct.

Saduharta said:

He means every post with kirito_(sao-ggo) is getting tagged with kirito, not that it's automatically getting tagged that.

Yeah, thats right. Maybe I misunderstanding what Implication is. Perhaps should suggested an Alias instead...
Only saying that new contents with kirito_(sao-ggo) should be tagged together with kirito tag, thats all