Tag implication: fang_out -> fang

create implication fang_out -> fang

Link to implication

If a character has a fang showing through a closed mouth, it goes without saying that they have a fang. Only concern I have is that fang_out can be used for both a single and double fangs showing, and there's no way for the system to know beforehand which one it needs to implicate.

Vid-szhite said:

Only concern I have is that fang_out can be used for both a single and double fangs showing, and there's no way for the system to know beforehand which one it needs to implicate.

Which would be a big reason why we wouldn't want to go through with the implication.

Things that would get mistagged fang_out fangs.

Gotcha. I actually didn't realize my only concern was pretty significant until just after I had posted it, so I totally understand.

Had originally done this, when I couldn't get forum pages to load, but I've removed it now.