Tag aliases: nipples, erect_nipples

create alias erect_nipples -> covered_nipples
create alias nipples -> bare_nipples

The erect_nipples tag is used for when nipples are visible through clothing (or otherwise covered by some type of cloth like a sheet). The current name of "erect nipples" does not convey this; the only way to know is to read the wiki, which has lead to widespread misuse of the tag.

The nipples tag is used when nipples are directly visible, without anything covering them. But from the name "nipples" alone it wouldn't be unreasonable to think covered up nipples count for the tag too.

Renaming the tags like this would make their usage more obvious at a glance.

create alias nipples -> bare_nipples

-1 for this, for the same reason that I would not need a bare_penis tag just because all images under erection refer to penises visible through clothing.

S1eth said:

create alias nipples -> bare_nipples

-1 for this, for the same reason that I would not need a bare_penis tag just because all images under erection refer to penises visible through clothing.

I'm not sure that's comparable. Penis doesn't specify that the penis must be directly visible, while nipples does. Images where the outline of a penis is visible through clothing still qualify for the penis tag, as far as I'm aware.

You mean bulge?

S1eth said:

You mean bulge?

Yes. There are plenty of images under penis bulge (for example, post #1565023), which wouldn't be the case if penis was only for bare penises as you claimed.

"Plenty"? Percentage-wise, not really. And quite of few of those have visible penises.

S1eth said:

"Plenty"? Percentage-wise, not really. And quite of few of those have visible penises.

It's still not the same; the wiki for nipples says that only visible nipples count for the tag, while the wiki for penis does not say that.

Did:
create alias erect_nipples -> covered_nipples

I'm not against nipples -> bare_nipples in theory but just plain nipples works too as long as it's defined. So I could go either way.