AkaringoP said:
and please check out other artwork by the same artist.
Background looks like 3D rendering. Character is likely hand-drawn. Nothing suspicious to me.
Posted under General
AkaringoP said:
and please check out other artwork by the same artist.
Background looks like 3D rendering. Character is likely hand-drawn. Nothing suspicious to me.
99% sure it's AI.
Their Patreon indicates multiple full-color images per day.
punished_K said:
99% sure it's AI.
Their Patreon indicates multiple full-color images per day.
make it 100%
that's some heavy obnoxious watermarking for someone who just typed stuff into a prompt
muneyuki, post #6527164 got tagged ai-generated.
Talulah said:
muneyuki, post #6527164 got tagged ai-generated.
Their paid reward animations and variant sets look impossible to be made by AI, even if it was used to make the base image.
hdk5 said:
Their paid reward animations and variant sets look impossible to be made by AI, even if it was used to make the base image.
I don't think we'd allow human-animated l2ds of AI generated art, but it's not really relevant when the posts in question are paid rewards which aren't allowed anyway.
Talulah said:
muneyuki, post #6527164 got tagged ai-generated.
No reason to believe it's AI-generated. Too clean, no artifacts, and is offered in animated form (https://twitter.com/shiromedaka10/media and https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/262147). At best it's possibly AI-assisted.
Every other one of the artist's posts are marked as ai-generated. Additionally, they all have the same image dimensions of 1773 x 2364. The metadata for the images is also the same.
8253803 said:
No reason to believe it's AI-generated. Too clean, no artifacts, and is offered in animated form (https://twitter.com/shiromedaka10/media and https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/262147). At best it's possibly AI-assisted.
It's very obviously AI and artefacted to hell and back, unlike the artist's earlier human-drawn works. You can see the manual corrections at high gamma. Also disappearing thumb and missing right ear. The live2d is irrelevant since these can easily be made from completed pictures.
Diet_Soda said:
It's very obviously AI and artefacted to hell and back, unlike the artist's earlier human-drawn works. You can see the manual corrections at high gamma. Also disappearing thumb and missing right ear. The live2d is irrelevant since these can easily be made from completed pictures.
The right ear and thumb are behind other objects. I wouldn't call them errors. That aside, is this what you mean by high gamma? Could you point out the artefacts (bar the compression artefacts) and manual corrections?
The grainy edge all over the art and low-res makes it pretty obvious that it was AI work. Based on the commentary, source, and uploader. This seems like yet another AI self promoter to me.
TrueKringe said:
The grainy edge all over the art and low-res makes it pretty obvious that it was AI work. Based on the commentary, source, and uploader. This seems like yet another AI self promoter to me.
Yeah. Are there ways to report accounts like this?
https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/79116616
Painted over AI? Biggest indicators are "AI face" (for the lack of a better word for the kind of expression AI draws), "AI hair" such as post #6304439 where strands pop out and merge in unnatural ways, and a shading & coloring texture that looks like AI.
8253803 said:
https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/79116616
Painted over AI? Biggest indicators are "AI face" (for the lack of a better word for the kind of expression AI draws), "AI hair" such as post #6304439 where strands pop out and merge in unnatural ways, and a shading & coloring texture that looks like AI.
oof... i checked the entire first page of this artist and saw at least one unambiguous indication of AI in every single image except the ones sourced from e-hentai (which look different enough in the style for me to suspect they're from this artist's pre-AI time), i'm baffled it all went under the radar for months like this
Mayhem-Chan said:
oof... i checked the entire first page of this artist and saw at least one unambiguous indication of AI in every single image except the ones sourced from e-hentai (which look different enough in the style for me to suspect they're from this artist's pre-AI time), i'm baffled it all went under the radar for months like this
What would you call this? ai-assisted or ai-generated? I struggle to determine the percentage of AI involvement here.
8253803 said:
What would you call this? ai-assisted or ai-generated? I struggle to determine the percentage of AI involvement here.
i genuinely think it's fair to go with ai-generated on anything where typical AI shenanigans are glaring and unfixed, if those things are still there then the artist's involvement in the piece, if there is any, is too superficial to warrant ai-assisted
Please point at the exact details you're talking about when making this kind of claims, ESPECIALLY if you're going to add ai-generated to dozens of posts. I personally can't see anything obvious about those posts.
I don't know how you can look at post #6401187 and say it's ai-generated. You can literally see the color brushstrokes in 4k. Just look at the armpits.
Look at the eyes in post #6362493, you can count the amount of times the artist clicked on the eyes in order to color them. How is that ai-generated??
Updated
nonamethanks said:
Please point at the exact details you're talking about when making this kind of claims, ESPECIALLY if you're going to add ai-generated to dozens of posts. I personally can't see anything obvious about those posts.
I don't know how you can look at post #6401187 and say it's ai-generated. You can literally see the color brushstrokes in 4k. Just look at the armpits.
Look at the eyes in post #6362493, you can count the amount of times the artist clicked on the eyes in order to color them. How is that ai-generated??
Agreeing with nonamethanks here. I dont see any indications of AI in these images
Or if not AI, looks really similar in style to asayuki101.
